procmailsc

TriggerTek Logo
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz_
PROCMAILSC(5)							PROCMAILSC(5)



NAME
       procmailsc - procmail weighted scoring technique

SYNOPSIS
       [*] w^x condition

DESCRIPTION
       In  addition to the traditional true or false conditions you can spec-
       ify on a recipe, you can use a weighted scoring technique to decide if
       a  certain  recipe matches or not.  When weighted scoring is used in a
       recipe, then the final score for that recipe must be positive  for  it
       to match.

       A  certain  condition can contribute to the score if you allocate it a
       ‘weight’ (w) and an ‘exponent’ (x).  You do this by preceding the con-
       dition (on the same line) with:
	      w^x
       Whereas	both  w	 and  x	 are  real  numbers between -2147483647.0 and
       2147483647.0 inclusive.


Weighted regular expression conditions
       The first time the regular expression is found, it will add w  to  the
       score.	The  second  time  it is found, w*x will be added.  The third
       time it is found, w*x*x will be added.  The fourth time	w*x*x*x	 will
       be added.  And so forth.

       This can be described by the following concise formula:

				   n
		   n   k-1	  x - 1
	      w * Sum x	   = w * -------
		  k=1		  x - 1

       It  represents  the  total added score for this condition if n matches
       are found.

       Note that the following case distinctions can be made:

       x=0     Only the first match will contribute w to the score.  Any sub-
	       sequent matches are ignored.

       x=1     Every  match  will  contribute  the  same w to the score.  The
	       score grows linearly with the number of matches found.

       0<x<1   Every match will contribute less to the score than the  previ-
	       ous  one.   The	score  will asymptotically approach a certain
	       value (see the NOTES section below).

       1<x     Every match will contribute more to the score than the  previ-
	       ous one.	 The score will grow exponentially.

       x<0     Can be utilised to favour odd or even number of matches.

       If  the	regular	 expression  is	 negated  (i.e.,  matches if it isn’t
       found), then n obviously can either be zero or one.

Weighted program conditions
       If the program returns an exitcode  of  EXIT_SUCCESS  (=0),  then  the
       total  added score will be w.  If it returns any other exitcode (indi-
       cating failure), the total added score will be x.

       If the exitcode of the program is negated, then, the exitcode will  be
       considered  as if it were a virtual number of matches.  Calculation of
       the added score then proceeds as if  it	had  been  a  normal  regular
       expression with n=‘exitcode’ matches.

Weighted length conditions
       If the length of the actual mail is M then:

	      * w^x  > L

       will generate an additional score of:

			 x
		  /  M	\
	      w * | --- |
		  \  L	/

       And:

	      * w^x  < L

       will generate an additional score of:

			 x
		  /  L	\
	      w * | --- |
		  \  M	/


       In  both	 cases,	 if L=M, this will add w to the score.	In the former
       case however, larger mails will	be  favoured,  in  the	latter	case,
       smaller mails will be favoured.	Although x can be varied to fine-tune
       the steepness of the function, typical usage sets x=1.

MISCELLANEOUS
       You can query the final score of all the conditions on a	 recipe	 from
       the  environment	 variable  $=.	 This variable is set every time just
       after procmail has parsed all conditions on  a  recipe  (even  if  the
       recipe is not being executed).

EXAMPLES
       The  following  recipe will ditch all mails having more than 150 lines
       in the body.  The first condition contains an empty regular expression
       which, because it always matches, is used to give our score a negative
       offset.	The second condition then matches every line in the mail, and
       consumes up the previous negative offset we gave (one point per line).
       In the end, the score will only be positive if the mail contained more
       than 150 lines.

	      :0 Bh
	      * -150^0
	      *	   1^1	^.*$
	      /dev/null

       Suppose	you  have a priority folder which you always read first.  The
       next recipe picks out the priority mail and files them in this special
       folder.	 The  first condition is a regular one, i.e., it doesn’t con-
       tribute to the score, but simply has to be satisfied.  The other	 con-
       ditions	describe  things like: john and claire usually have something
       important to say, meetings are usually important, replies are favoured
       a  bit,	mails about Elvis (this is merely an example :-) are favoured
       (the more he is mentioned, the more the mail is favoured, but the max-
       imum  extra score due to Elvis will be 4000, no matter how often he is
       mentioned), lots of quoted lines are disliked, smileys are appreciated
       (the score for those will reach a maximum of 3500), those three people
       usually don’t send interesting mails, the mails should  preferably  be
       small  (e.g.,  2000  bytes long mails will score -100, 4000 bytes long
       mails do -800).	As you see, if some of the uninteresting people	 send
       mail,  then  the	 mail  still  has a chance of landing in the priority
       folder, e.g., if it is about a meeting, or if it contains at least two
       smileys.

	      :0 HB
	      *		!^Precedence:.*(junk|bulk)
	      * 2000^0	 ^From:.*(john@home|claire@work)
	      * 2000^0	 ^Subject:.*meeting
	      *	 300^0	 ^Subject:.*Re:
	      * 1000^.75 elvis|presley
	      * -100^1	 ^>
	      *	 350^.9	 :-\)
	      * -500^0	 ^From:.*(boss|jane|henry)@work
	      * -100^3	 > 2000
	      priority_folder

       If  you	are  subscribed to a mailinglist, and just would like to read
       the quality mails, then the following  recipes  could  do  the  trick.
       First we make sure that the mail is coming from the mailinglist.	 Then
       we check if it is from certain persons of whom we value	the  opinion,
       or about a subject we absolutely want to know everything about.	If it
       is, file it.  Otherwise, check if the ratio of quoted lines to  origi-
       nal lines is at most 1:2.  If it exceeds that, ditch the mail.  Every-
       thing that survived the previous test, is filed.

	      :0
	      ^From mailinglist-request@some.where
	      {
		:0:
		* ^(From:.*(paula|bill)|Subject:.*skiing)
		mailinglist

		:0 Bh
		*  20^1 ^>
		* -10^1 ^[^>]
		/dev/null

		:0:
		mailinglist
	      }

       For further examples you should look in the procmailex(5) man page.

CAVEATS
       Because this speeds up the search by an order of magnitude, the	proc-
       mail  internal  egrep  will  always  search  for the leftmost shortest
       match, unless it is determining what to assign to MATCH, in which case
       it  searches the leftmost longest match.	 E.g. for the leftmost short-
       est match, by itself, the regular expression:

       .*     will always match a zero length string at the same spot.

       .+     will always match one character (except newlines of course).

SEE ALSO
       procmail(1), procmailrc(5), procmailex(5), sh(1), csh(1), egrep(1),
       grep(1),

BUGS
       If,  in	a length condition, you specify an x that causes an overflow,
       procmail is at the mercy of the pow(3) function in  your	 mathematical
       library.

       Floating	 point	numbers	 in ‘engineering’ format (e.g., 12e5) are not
       accepted.

MISCELLANEOUS
       As soon as ‘plus infinity’ (2147483647)	is  reached,  any  subsequent
       weighted conditions will simply be skipped.

       As  soon	 as  ‘minus infinity’ (-2147483647) is reached, the condition
       will be considered as ‘no match’ and the recipe will terminate  early.

NOTES
       If  in  a  regular  expression weighted formula 0<x<1, the total added
       score for this condition will asymptotically approach:

		 w
	      -------
	       1 - x

       In order to reach half the maximum value you need

		   - ln 2
	      n = --------
		     ln x

       matches.

AUTHORS
       Stephen R. van den Berg
	      <srb@cuci.nl>
       Philip A. Guenther
	      <guenther@sendmail.com>



BuGless				  2001/08/04			PROCMAILSC(5)